<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Throw another roo on the barbie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conservationbytes.com/2008/11/21/throw-another-roo-on-the-barbie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conservationbytes.com/2008/11/21/throw-another-roo-on-the-barbie/</link>
	<description>Conservation research... with bite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 04:42:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Russell</title>
		<link>http://conservationbytes.com/2008/11/21/throw-another-roo-on-the-barbie/#comment-1147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoff Russell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 23:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coreybradshaw.wordpress.com/?p=1089#comment-1147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Corey and Paul. Kangaroo numbers have crashed with the drought. Here
are the SA stats:

http://www.environment.sa.gov.au/biodiversity/pdfs/kang_harvest_stats.pdf

other states are similar, but I haven&#039;t found such a nice summary table. Its
the funniest looking &quot;super-abundance&quot; I&#039;ve ever seen.  

Most hunting restrictions date back to a time when there were no restrictions and
hunters looked like wiping out species. Over time people forget this and think of
restrictions as &quot;barriers to harvesting and eating wild meat&quot;.  I don&#039;t know the
kangaroo history, but with ducks the sale of duck meat was as early
as 1928 (in SA) to prevent the wiping out of species.  Wildlife provides 
so little meat that it 
can never be a serious food source. A possum will eat a heap of food and take
12 months to get to the same size as a chicken does in 6 weeks --- similarly
with kangaroos.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corey and Paul. Kangaroo numbers have crashed with the drought. Here<br />
are the SA stats:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.environment.sa.gov.au/biodiversity/pdfs/kang_harvest_stats.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.environment.sa.gov.au/biodiversity/pdfs/kang_harvest_stats.pdf</a></p>
<p>other states are similar, but I haven&#8217;t found such a nice summary table. Its<br />
the funniest looking &#8220;super-abundance&#8221; I&#8217;ve ever seen.  </p>
<p>Most hunting restrictions date back to a time when there were no restrictions and<br />
hunters looked like wiping out species. Over time people forget this and think of<br />
restrictions as &#8220;barriers to harvesting and eating wild meat&#8221;.  I don&#8217;t know the<br />
kangaroo history, but with ducks the sale of duck meat was as early<br />
as 1928 (in SA) to prevent the wiping out of species.  Wildlife provides<br />
so little meat that it<br />
can never be a serious food source. A possum will eat a heap of food and take<br />
12 months to get to the same size as a chicken does in 6 weeks &#8212; similarly<br />
with kangaroos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Bradshaw</title>
		<link>http://conservationbytes.com/2008/11/21/throw-another-roo-on-the-barbie/#comment-1033</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Corey Bradshaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coreybradshaw.wordpress.com/?p=1089#comment-1033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Paul. I think one thing people who are against eating roo tend to forget is that there are A LOT more of them now that we irrigate the hell out of the closer rangelands. There are many more so-called &#039;nuisance&#039; wildlife incidents simply because we&#039;ve made the land better for them. As such, there is a super-abundance, a non-natural state that exists only because of humans (note that the concept of &#039;natural&#039; is now an utter furphy because we&#039;ll never, ever, have &#039;natural&#039; as long as humans exists at in the densities they do now). So, why don&#039;t we reduce the reliance on cattle, remove the barriers to harvesting and eating wild meat, and generally improve the climate at the same time?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Paul. I think one thing people who are against eating roo tend to forget is that there are A LOT more of them now that we irrigate the hell out of the closer rangelands. There are many more so-called &#8216;nuisance&#8217; wildlife incidents simply because we&#8217;ve made the land better for them. As such, there is a super-abundance, a non-natural state that exists only because of humans (note that the concept of &#8216;natural&#8217; is now an utter furphy because we&#8217;ll never, ever, have &#8216;natural&#8217; as long as humans exists at in the densities they do now). So, why don&#8217;t we reduce the reliance on cattle, remove the barriers to harvesting and eating wild meat, and generally improve the climate at the same time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://conservationbytes.com/2008/11/21/throw-another-roo-on-the-barbie/#comment-1026</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coreybradshaw.wordpress.com/?p=1089#comment-1026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sadly Corey, in the area around where you live, kangaroos are over abundant and destroying efforts to put back habitat by browsing on seedlings. Landholders are allowed to shoot kangaroos if they get a permit, but are required to leave the carcasses where they fall. They are not allowed to be harvested. This does not make sense. Elsewhere in South Australia kangaroos can be shot and processed for food. Why not close by where the majority of the population live and close to export facilities?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly Corey, in the area around where you live, kangaroos are over abundant and destroying efforts to put back habitat by browsing on seedlings. Landholders are allowed to shoot kangaroos if they get a permit, but are required to leave the carcasses where they fall. They are not allowed to be harvested. This does not make sense. Elsewhere in South Australia kangaroos can be shot and processed for food. Why not close by where the majority of the population live and close to export facilities?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

