<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tropical forests worth more standing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conservationbytes.com/2009/06/04/tropical-forests-worth-more-standing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conservationbytes.com/2009/06/04/tropical-forests-worth-more-standing/</link>
	<description>Conservation research... with bite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 05:05:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unholy trinity of leakage, permanence and additionality &#171; ConservationBytes.com</title>
		<link>http://conservationbytes.com/2009/06/04/tropical-forests-worth-more-standing/#comment-13381</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Unholy trinity of leakage, permanence and additionality &#171; ConservationBytes.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 02:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationbytes.com/?p=2180#comment-13381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] which is the clever idea of trading carbon credits to keep forests intact. As we know, living forests can suck up a lot of carbon from the atmosphere (remember your high school biology lesson on photosynthesis? Carbon dioxide in. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which is the clever idea of trading carbon credits to keep forests intact. As we know, living forests can suck up a lot of carbon from the atmosphere (remember your high school biology lesson on photosynthesis? Carbon dioxide in. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: When you have no idea, you should shut up &#171; ConservationBytes.com</title>
		<link>http://conservationbytes.com/2009/06/04/tropical-forests-worth-more-standing/#comment-9245</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[When you have no idea, you should shut up &#171; ConservationBytes.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 04:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationbytes.com/?p=2180#comment-9245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] palm is planted forest – It is not, either in terms of the amount of carbon it sequesters (see also here) or the biodiversity it supports (see above and Edwards et al. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] palm is planted forest – It is not, either in terms of the amount of carbon it sequesters (see also here) or the biodiversity it supports (see above and Edwards et al. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mded</title>
		<link>http://conservationbytes.com/2009/06/04/tropical-forests-worth-more-standing/#comment-2549</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mded]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationbytes.com/?p=2180#comment-2549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The best thing to be done for the cash crop is to not expanding the plantation area but increasing the production on available plantation area with new technologies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best thing to be done for the cash crop is to not expanding the plantation area but increasing the production on available plantation area with new technologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

