<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Impact Factors for conservation journals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conservationbytes.com/2009/06/23/new-impact-factors-for-conservation-journals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conservationbytes.com/2009/06/23/new-impact-factors-for-conservation-journals/</link>
	<description>Conservation research... with bite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 05:05:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2010 ISI Impact Factors out now (with some surprises) &#171; ConservationBytes.com</title>
		<link>http://conservationbytes.com/2009/06/23/new-impact-factors-for-conservation-journals/#comment-7510</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[2010 ISI Impact Factors out now (with some surprises) &#171; ConservationBytes.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationbytes.com/?p=2261#comment-7510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I&#8217;ve done for 2008 and 2009, I&#8217;ve taken the liberty of providing the new IFs for some prominent conservation and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve done for 2008 and 2009, I&#8217;ve taken the liberty of providing the new IFs for some prominent conservation and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2010 in review &#171; ConservationBytes.com</title>
		<link>http://conservationbytes.com/2009/06/23/new-impact-factors-for-conservation-journals/#comment-5166</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[2010 in review &#171; ConservationBytes.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 12:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationbytes.com/?p=2261#comment-5166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] New Impact Factors for conservation journals June 2009 1 comment 5 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New Impact Factors for conservation journals June 2009 1 comment 5 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ISI 2009 Impact Factors now out &#171; ConservationBytes.com</title>
		<link>http://conservationbytes.com/2009/06/23/new-impact-factors-for-conservation-journals/#comment-3856</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ISI 2009 Impact Factors now out &#171; ConservationBytes.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 01:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationbytes.com/?p=2261#comment-3856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 2009 Impact Factors now&#160;out  18 06 2010   Last year I reported the 2008 ISI Impact Factors for some prominent conservation journals and a few other journals [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2009 Impact Factors now&nbsp;out  18 06 2010   Last year I reported the 2008 ISI Impact Factors for some prominent conservation journals and a few other journals [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

