<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Out of touch, impractical and irrelevant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conservationbytes.com/2009/07/08/out-of-touch-impractical-and-irrelevant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conservationbytes.com/2009/07/08/out-of-touch-impractical-and-irrelevant/</link>
	<description>Conservation research... with bite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 05:05:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservation research rarely equals conservation &#171; ConservationBytes.com</title>
		<link>http://conservationbytes.com/2009/07/08/out-of-touch-impractical-and-irrelevant/#comment-4056</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Conservation research rarely equals conservation &#171; ConservationBytes.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 04:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationbytes.com/?p=2326#comment-4056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] between conservation research and actual conservation. I&#8217;ve posted about this before (see Out of touch, impractical and irrelevant &amp; Make your conservation PhD relevant), but this was a sobering reminder of how conservation [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] between conservation research and actual conservation. I&#8217;ve posted about this before (see Out of touch, impractical and irrelevant &amp; Make your conservation PhD relevant), but this was a sobering reminder of how conservation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linking Policy to Science &#171; LitFuse</title>
		<link>http://conservationbytes.com/2009/07/08/out-of-touch-impractical-and-irrelevant/#comment-3307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Linking Policy to Science &#171; LitFuse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationbytes.com/?p=2326#comment-3307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Policy to&#160;Science  Corey, thanks for posting a link to the Gibbons et al paper on  linking science to policy makers. The suggestions by Gibbons et al [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Policy to&nbsp;Science  Corey, thanks for posting a link to the Gibbons et al paper on  linking science to policy makers. The suggestions by Gibbons et al [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jono</title>
		<link>http://conservationbytes.com/2009/07/08/out-of-touch-impractical-and-irrelevant/#comment-2599</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jono]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationbytes.com/?p=2326#comment-2599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there a job for a person to do this? That is, someone who acts as a mediator between researchers and policy makers? Maybe has some training from both sides, possibly employed by the government? Or maybe someone who is a policy maker, or part of a team of such, but has a background in research?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a job for a person to do this? That is, someone who acts as a mediator between researchers and policy makers? Maybe has some training from both sides, possibly employed by the government? Or maybe someone who is a policy maker, or part of a team of such, but has a background in research?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

