<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Connectivity paradigm in extinction biology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conservationbytes.com/2009/10/06/connectivity-paradigm-in-extinction-biology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conservationbytes.com/2009/10/06/connectivity-paradigm-in-extinction-biology/</link>
	<description>Conservation research... with bite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 05:05:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: To corridor, or not to corridor: size is the question &#171; ConservationBytes.com</title>
		<link>http://conservationbytes.com/2009/10/06/connectivity-paradigm-in-extinction-biology/#comment-14091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[To corridor, or not to corridor: size is the question &#171; ConservationBytes.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 04:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationbytes.com/?p=2897#comment-14091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is probably not quite as important as we once believed for population persistence. I&#8217;ve blogged before about several papers that have over-turned the &#8216;connectivity paradigm&#8217; th... (mini ecosystems), and coincidentally, found another by Mike Bull &amp; colleagues that just came [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is probably not quite as important as we once believed for population persistence. I&#8217;ve blogged before about several papers that have over-turned the &#8216;connectivity paradigm&#8217; th&#8230; (mini ecosystems), and coincidentally, found another by Mike Bull &amp; colleagues that just came [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ResearchBlogging.org News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Editor&#8217;s Selections: Threatened species &#8211; Going, Gone, Come Back!</title>
		<link>http://conservationbytes.com/2009/10/06/connectivity-paradigm-in-extinction-biology/#comment-2864</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ResearchBlogging.org News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Editor&#8217;s Selections: Threatened species &#8211; Going, Gone, Come Back!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationbytes.com/?p=2897#comment-2864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of preventing the extinction of threatened species. Corey Bradshaw at conservationbytes points to two new papers that suggest that increasing the quality of available habitats and the boosting total population [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of preventing the extinction of threatened species. Corey Bradshaw at conservationbytes points to two new papers that suggest that increasing the quality of available habitats and the boosting total population [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

