<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not so &#8216;looming&#8217; &#8211; Anthropocene extinctions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conservationbytes.com/2009/11/04/not-so-looming-anthropocene-extinctions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conservationbytes.com/2009/11/04/not-so-looming-anthropocene-extinctions/</link>
	<description>Conservation research... with bite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:57:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: News Roundup &#124; a Conservation Blog</title>
		<link>http://conservationbytes.com/2009/11/04/not-so-looming-anthropocene-extinctions/#comment-3000</link>
		<dc:creator>News Roundup &#124; a Conservation Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationbytes.com/?p=3029#comment-3000</guid>
		<description>[...] Some discussion has arisen about conservation targets due to a recent publication in Conservation Letters. One problem with setting a target may be seen in Britain, where rare species appear to be increasing in abundance (i.e. doing better), while common species are in decline. Sometimes the whole thing feels sort of like the little boy with his finger in the dam. The newly-released IUCN Red List suggests that about 36% of the species analyzed are threatened with extinction (CJB weighs in). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some discussion has arisen about conservation targets due to a recent publication in Conservation Letters. One problem with setting a target may be seen in Britain, where rare species appear to be increasing in abundance (i.e. doing better), while common species are in decline. Sometimes the whole thing feels sort of like the little boy with his finger in the dam. The newly-released IUCN Red List suggests that about 36% of the species analyzed are threatened with extinction (CJB weighs in). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://conservationbytes.com/2009/11/04/not-so-looming-anthropocene-extinctions/#comment-2985</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationbytes.com/?p=3029#comment-2985</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by conservbytes: Not so &#039;looming&#039; - Anthropocene extinctions: http://wp.me/phhT4-MR...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by conservbytes: Not so &#8216;looming&#8217; &#8211; Anthropocene extinctions: <a href="http://wp.me/phhT4-MR.." rel="nofollow">http://wp.me/phhT4-MR..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
