http://conservationbytes.com/2009/12/15/a-magic-conservation-number/ Conservation research... with bite Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:17:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://conservationbytes.com/2009/12/15/a-magic-conservation-number/#comment-9956 Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:46:22 +0000 http://conservationbytes.com/?p=3248#comment-9956 [...] to the critique. While the title of several high-profile media outlets used the term ‘magic number‘, we never used the term or supported the idea of a ‘one-number-fits-all’ [...]

]]> http://conservationbytes.com/2009/12/15/a-magic-conservation-number/#comment-5191 Sat, 08 Jan 2011 06:07:50 +0000 http://conservationbytes.com/?p=3248#comment-5191 [...] written in past posts about the ‘magic’ minimum number of individuals that should be in a population to reduce the chance of extinction from random events. The so-called [...]

]]> http://conservationbytes.com/2009/12/15/a-magic-conservation-number/#comment-3100 Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:47:26 +0000 http://conservationbytes.com/?p=3248#comment-3100 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by ConservationBytes, ConservationBytes. ConservationBytes said: A magic conservation number: http://wp.me/phhT4-Qo [...]

]]>