Over at ALERT (Alliance of Leading Environmental Researchers & Thinkers), Bill Laurance has highlighted yet another major blow to environmentalism in Australia: the Coalition’s latest push is to ban consumer boycotts of environmentally damaging corporations. The following press release went out this morning. You can also find more details on the Abbott proposal here and here.
—
An international scientific group has decried an Australian government proposal to ban consumer boycotts of corporations that damage the environment.
“It’s clearly a bad idea,” said William Laurance, a professor at James Cook University in Australia and director of ALERT, the Alliance of Leading Environmental Researchers and Thinkers.
“Boycotts have been one of the most important arrows in the quiver of responsible conservationists and consumers,” said Laurance. “They’ve convinced many environmentally predatory firms around the world to clean up their acts.”
Consumer boycotts have improved the behaviour of hundreds of aggressive timber, oil palm, soy, seafood and other corporations around the world, say the scientists.
“Boycotts get the attention of environment-destroying companies because they hit them where it hurts—their reputation and market share,” said Corey Bradshaw, a professor at the University of Adelaide.
The proposal is being floated by the Liberal-National Coalition headed by Prime Minister Tony Abbott. The Coalition is unhappy with campaigns targeting some Australian companies selling old-growth timber products and seafood.
“I don’t see this as effective policy,” said Thomas Lovejoy, a renowned ecologist and former environmental advisor to three U.S. presidents. “It’s a polarising idea that could harm the environment while impinging on the rights of Australians to free speech.”
“The Coalition is trying to stop environmentally aware consumers from voting with their pocketbooks,” said Laurance. “Banning boycotts would make it easier for corporations to destroy rainforests, imperil orangutans and deplete the world’s oceans.”
ConservationBytes.com 
[…] Australia has an appalling environmental record — hell, I have even written an entire book on our sorry state of environmental affairs. Of course, environmental damage is a slow accumulation of bad political decisions, neglect, corruption, greed and society’s general I-couldn’t-give-a-shit attitude, but the record of our recent government demonstrates not just classic political buffoonery and neglect, but an outright attack on the environment. […]
LikeLike
[…] of knowledge for knowledge’s sake. Whenever I’m feeling overly exasperated by the idiots we elect to public office, or when some celebrity spouts evidence-free rubbish about a new miracle cure, or when a religious […]
LikeLike
[…] Despite our remarkably low average population density (a mere 3.09 people per square kilometre), Australia is in fact one of the most urbanised nations on the planet, with nearly 90% of its citizenry living within a major urban centre. As a result, our largely urban/suburban, latte-sipping, supermarket-shopping population has little, if any, connection to the vast landscape that surrounds its comfortable, built-up environs. There should be little wonder then that Australians are so disconnected from their own ecology, and little surprise that our elected officials (who, after all, represent the values of the majority of the citizens they purport to represent), are doing nothing to slow the rapid flushing of our environment down the toilet. Indeed, the current government is in fact actively encouraging the pace of that destruction. […]
LikeLike
[…] As has been well documented, the Abbott-oir ship of fools has also done whatever it can to turn back decades of environmental protections in less than six months of taking office. Everything from opening up national parks for […]
LikeLike
[…] Abbott-oir, easily the most environmentally destructive Prime Minister this country has seen in the modern era, has survived the party room spill for a leadership […]
LikeLike
[…] approaches mention anything about dingoes, nor do they challenge their government’s renewed love for habitat destruction and deforestation. Cats kill, but habitat destruction and continued bush clearing will have far more lasting and […]
LikeLike
[…] my words, you plutocrats, denialists, fossil-fuel hacks and science charlatans – your time will come when you will be […]
LikeLike
[…] of prestige, political power and international oversight. A point in question is that our current train-wreck government in Australia has recently tried to remove the World Heritage status of Tasmanian […]
LikeLike
[…] do to alleviate the problems. Apart from the obvious necessity of voting out the current idiot politicians intent on ruining this country, I have some simple […]
LikeLike
[…] the devastation of the Amazon. We are systematically eroding our national protected areas, and have elected a government working hard to destroy any hint of remaining environmental protection left in …. The list goes […]
LikeLike
And so soon after Japanese stop whaling, and the Mozilla CEO steps down and Chilis cave in and remove donations for some anti-vax autism group. Got to give it to him, he recognizes a rising adversary tactic that actually has increasing potential. Thanks Internet. It will be hard to police silent boycotts, but the idea is still abhorrent.
LikeLike
WTF!
LikeLike