We treat our wildlife like vermin

24 09 2014
Just a little of the dog fence's carnage and cruelty at work.

Just a little of the dog fence’s carnage and cruelty at work.

I’ve pointed out in several posts on ConservationBytes.com just how badly Australia is doing in the environmental stakes, with massive deforestation continuing since colonial times, feral predators and herbivores blanketing the continent, inadequate protected areas, piss-weak policies and a government at war with its own environment. Despite a few recent wins in marine conservation, Australia has a dreadful track record.

Now in another monumental demonstration of stupidity, corruption and colonial-era attitudes toward native wildlife, Western Australia has outdone itself by sneaking through legislation to extend its so-called ‘Barrier Fence’ in an effort to isolate its marginal farmland from dingoes, emus and other ‘nuisance’ species.

As I and several others have pointed out before, the mere existence of the record-breaking dingo fence is not only counter-productive, it is expensive and utterly archaic. It should be torn down entirely.

Instead, the Western Australian government wants to extend the national fence, and they’ve approved the plan it without going through any of the appropriate checks in the system. Its environmental impacts have not been adequately assessed, nor has the public been given the opportunity to oppose the plans. In my view, the people responsible for this act should go to gaol.

In a recent paper led by Keith Bradby entitled Ecological connectivity or Barrier Fence? Critical choices on the agricultural margins of Western Australia, we show how the Western Australia state government has not followed any of its own environmental legislation and rushed through these idiotic proposals. If you do not subscribe to Ecological Management and Restoration, you can obtain a copy of the paper by e-mailing Keith or me.

We also review the horrendous ecological toll these fences have, and highlight the disgusting ways in which animal welfare is completely compromised. Warning: the carnage is brutal.

If you are a Western Australian voter, it would be a good time to raise a little hell about these proposals to stop them in their tracks. Scientific evidence and public pressure won the day for sharks – now it’s terrestrial Western Australia that needs your support.

CJA Bradshaw



4 responses

12 07 2019
“Overabundant” wildlife usually isn’t | ConservationBytes.com

[…] annoying — from kangaroos, to white sharks, to crocodiles, to wedge-tailed eagles, to dingoes, to emus. Yes, Australia loves to slaughter its […]


30 01 2015
What’s in a name? The dingo’s sorry saga | ConservationBytes.com

[…] not just the horrible welfare issues that poisoning and thousands of kilometres of fences have on our native wildlife, or the vast and growing body of […]


25 09 2014
Julie Fechner (dingolady)

Great post Corey, but unfortunately you forgot the stupidity of the Victorian Government. Last week, with one stroke of the pen Minister Peter Ryan changed the face of environmental management in Victoria by unprotecting dingoes (a threatened species in Victoria) on all public land. This has essentially given a green light to lethal control of wild dogs and dingoes on all public land in Victoria. All this even following the listing of the dingo as threatened in 2008, a three kilometre buffer zone was introduced on public land adjoining private property where lethal control could be implemented; outside this buffer zone no lethal control was permitted. This decision was made in collaboration with Scientists, Conservationists, the Farmers’ Federation and Wild Dog Action groups as the best outcome to protect a threatened species and provide safety for livestock. It now seems that the Minister has rejected the combined advice of this group and has given doggers and farmers a green light to bait and trap on all public land.

Added to this the Minister also announced that doggers will have 72 hours to check dog traps; a serious cruelty issue as no member of the public would be permitted to confine a dog for 72 hours (three days) without food or water.


25 09 2014

Listening to evidence isn’t exactly the forte of today’s politicians in Australia.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: