New Impact Factors for conservation journals

23 06 2009

For those of you who follow the ISI Impact Factors for journals (the ratio of the number of total citations i+3 for the papers published in years i and i+1 divided by the total number of citable papers published in years i and i+1), you might know that the 2008 IFs have just been published. Now, whether you put stock or not in these is somewhat irrelevant – enough people do to make it relevant to who publishes what where, and who cites or does not cite scientific papers. It’s also in our scientific culture – pretty much everyone in a field will have a rough idea of the range of IFs their specific discipline’s journals span, and so it acts as a kind of target for varying qualities of science. Far from perfect, but it’s what we have to deal with.

So, I thought I’d publish the 2008 Impact Factors for the journals listed on this site’s Journals page and compare them to the 2007 values:

and for some more general journals that occasionally publish conservation papers:

Almost across the board, conservation journals have seen an increase in their Impact Factors. There are many other good conservation papers published in other journals, but this list probably represents the main outlets. I hope we continue to focus more on conservation outcomes rather than scientific kudos per se, although I’m certainly cognisant of the hand that feeds. Good luck with your publishing.

CJA Bradshaw

Add to FacebookAdd to NewsvineAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Furl



11 responses

27 08 2018
Journal ranks 2017 |

[…] See also the previous years’ rankings (2016, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008). […]


14 07 2017
Journal ranks 2016 |

[…] Last year we wrote a bibliometric paper describing a new way to rank journals, which I contend is a fairer representation of relative citation-based rankings by combining existing ones (e.g., ISI, Google Scholar and Scopus) into a composite rank. So, here are the 2016 ranks for (i) 93 ecology, conservation and multidisciplinary journals, and a subset of (ii) 46 ecology journals, (iii) 21 conservation journals, just as I have done in previous years (2015, 2014,  2013, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008). […]


28 03 2017
Ecology and Conservation Impact – SAHARA

[…] previously listed the 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 IF for major conservation and ecology journals. As before, I’ve included […]


26 07 2016
Journal ranks 2015 |

[…] For previous lists based on ISI Impact Factors (except 2014), see the following links (2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, […]


18 02 2016
How to rank journals |

[…] journals in conservation ecology according to their ISI® Impact Factor (see lists for 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 & 2013). These lists have proven to be exceedingly […]


1 08 2014
A fairer way to rank conservation and ecology journals in 2014 |

[…] journals that also publish conservation-related material from time to time (see my lists of the 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 Impact Factor […]


20 06 2013
Conservation and ecology journal Impact Factors 2012 |

[…] previously listed the 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 IF for major conservation and ecology journals. As before, I’ve […]


29 06 2012
Conservation and Ecology Impact Factors 2011 «

[…] previously listed the 2008, 2009 and 2010 IF for major conservation and ecology journals – now here are the 2011 IF […]


29 06 2011
2010 ISI Impact Factors out now (with some surprises) «

[…] I’ve done for 2008 and 2009, I’ve taken the liberty of providing the new IFs for some prominent conservation and […]


2 01 2011
2010 in review «

[…] New Impact Factors for conservation journals June 2009 1 comment 5 […]


18 06 2010
ISI 2009 Impact Factors now out «

[…] 2009 Impact Factors now out 18 06 2010 Last year I reported the 2008 ISI Impact Factors for some prominent conservation journals and a few other journals […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s